Kesaksian Testimonium De Auditu dalam Upaya Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research more focuses on the value of testimony witness testimonium de auditu in the case of coitus that the only one witness only while in the training kuhap we know one witness not witness. But the problems studied is how the value of testimony testimonium de auditu for evidence of the criminal intercourse? How can the application of testimony testimonium de auditu in an effort to of coitus according to criminal law progressive perspective?.The research is legal research normative with pendakatan case, approach perundang-undangan and approach concept. The results of the study found that the value of testimony testimonium de auditu but did not have the decisions dropped by a judge is a form of a breakthrough law as he will by law progressive therefore suggested should be in a criminal offense coitus testimony from testimonum de auditu in admit and needs to get a rule khsusus about crime coitus with the utmost one witness is a witness.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Sukris Sarmadi, “Membebaskan Positivisme Hukum Ke Ranah Hukum Progresif (Studi Pembacaan Teks Hukum Penegak Hukum)”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 12, No. 2 Mei 2012, 12 (2). pp. 331-343. ISSN 1410-0797
Alamsyah, Nur Andi, 2014, Kedudukan Saksi Non Muslim Dalam Praktik Hukum Acara Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Skripsi Fakultas hukum, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar
Asmuni, “Testimonium De Auditu Telaah Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Fiqh”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 3, Nomor 2 Juli 2014, 10.25216/JHP.3.2.2014.191-202
Hwian Christianto, “Penafsiran Hukum Progresif Dalam Perkara Pidana”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 23, Nomor. 3 Oktober 2011, https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16170
M. Syamsudin, “Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Korupsi Berbasis hukum Progresif”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 11, No. 1 Januari 2011, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.11
M. Syamsudin, “Rekonstruksi Perilaku Etik Hakim dalam Menangani Perkara Berbasis Hukum Progresif”, Jurnal Hukum, No. Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011, JHIusQuiaIustum at http://journal.uii.ac.id/index.php/IUSTUM
Mahrus Ali, “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Progresif; Alternatif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum, No.2 Vol. 14 April 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss2.art2
Novita Dyah Kumala Sari, Syafrudin Yudowibowo dan Soehartono, “Kekuatan Pembuktian Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Pada Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Putusan Nomor 216/PDT.G/2015/PA.SGT)”, Jurnal Verstek, Volume 4 No. 3 Desember 2016,
Setya Wahyudi, “Penegakan Peradilan Pidana Anak Dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresif Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 9. No. 1 Januari 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2009.9.1.52
Tedi Sudrajat, Aspirasi Reformasi Hukum Dan Penegakan Hukum Progresif Melalui Media Hakim Perdamaian Desa, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 10. No. 3 September 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.3.99