Pemimpin Abusif Dan Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan: Sebuah Kerangka Konseptual
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini memiliki dua tujuan utama. Pertama, menjelaskan secara teoretikal tentang hubungan antara pimpinan abusif dan kepuasan kerja karyawan. Kedua, penelitian ini mengusulkan model alternatif dengan mengkonsepkan locus of control sebagai variabel pemoderasi yang diharapkan dapat memperjelas hubungan antara pimpinan abusif dan kepuasan kerja. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode systematic literature review yang bersumber dari artikel nasional dan internasional bereputasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah sebuah kerangka konseptual yang diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan baru tentang konsep pemimpin abusif, kepuasan kerja dan locus of control. Pengaruh negatif pemimpin abusif terhadap kepuasan kerja dapat diminimalisir dengan memperhatikan locus of control karyawan. Penelitian ini mengusulkan proposisi yang dapat diuji secara empiris untuk penelitian selanjutnya.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Avey, J. B., K. Wu., & E. Holley. (2015). The Influence of Abusive Supervision and Job Embeddedness on Citizenship and Deviance. Journal of Bussiness Ethics. Vol 129, pp 721–731.
Bani‐Hani, M. A., & Hamdan‐Mansour, A. M. (2021). The moderation effect of locus of control on the relationship between job demand and job satisfaction among nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 27(1), e12876.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
Cahyono, E. (2011). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja pada Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) dengan Komitmen Tim sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi (Studi pada Karyawan PT. PLN (Persero) Apj Surakarta).
Cahyono, E. (2021). Hubungan antara Pemimpin Abusif dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Apakah Agreeableness sebagai Pemoderasi?. JURNAL EKOMAKS Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 10(2), 95-100.
Cahyono, E., & Abdullah, S. (2020). Exploring the Model of Abusive Supervision and Employee’s Turnover Intention: Is Neuroticism a Moderator?. In ICAME 2020: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Accounting, Management and Economics, ICAME 2020, 14-15 October 2020, Makassar, Indonesia(p. 119). European Alliance for Innovation.
Cahyono, E., Haryono, T., Haryanto, B., & Harsono, M. (2020). A New Insight in Relation between Abusive Supervision and Work Outcomes: A Conceptual Review. Quality-Access to Success, 21 (177), 26-30. (a)
Cahyono, E., Haryono, T., Haryanto, B., & Harsono, M. (2020). The Role of Gender in the Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Employee’s Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in Indonesia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 13 (3), 311-322. (b)
Cahyono, E., & Widarjo, W. (2022). Abusive Leader and Employee’s Job Satisfaction: The Role of Extraversion. Himalayan Journal of Economics and Business Management, Vol 3 Issue 1.
Cahyono, E., & Haryanto, B. (2023). How does the role of gender perspective and self-efficacy minimise the negative impacts of abusive leaders? An experimental design study. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 7(3), 240-259.
Chu, L. (2013). Mediating toxic emotions in the workplace - the impact of abusive supervision. Journal of Nursing Management. Vol 22, No 8, pp 953-963.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management. Vol 31, No 6, pp 874-900.
Decoster, S., J. Camps., & J. Stouten. (2014). The mediating role of LMX between abusive supervision and work behaviors A replication and extension. American Journal of Business. Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 61-75.
Giorgi, G., J.M. Leon-Peres., & A. Arenas. (2014). Are Bullying Behaviors Tolerated in Some Cultures? Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction Among Italian Workers. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol 131, No 1, pp 227–237.
Hancock, P. (2000). The lived experience of female factory workers in rural West java. Labor and Management in Development Journal, 1(1), 1-18
Harris, K. J., K.M. Kacmar., & S. Zivnuska. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadership Quarterly. Vol 18, pp 252- 263.
Haryanto, B., & Cahyono, E. (2019). Relationship between abusive supervision and Performance: the role of gender. European Research Studies Journal, 22(3), 305-311.
Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization. Vol 13, pp 46-74.
Jiang, W., Wang, L., & Lin, H. (2016). The role of cognitive processes and individual differences in the relationship between abusive supervision and employee career satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 155-160.
Mahmoud, A. B., Reisel, W. D., Fuxman, L., & Hack‐Polay, D. (2022). Locus of control as a moderator of the effects of COVID‐19 perceptions on job insecurity, psychosocial, organisational, and job outcomes for MENA region hospitality employees. European Management Review, 19(2), 313-332.
Mathieu, C., & P. Babiak. (2016). Corporate psychopathy and abusive supervision: Their influence on employees' job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol 91, pp 102- 106.
Mitchell, M. S., & M.L. Ambrose. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol 92, No 4, pp 1159- 1168.
Ogunfowora, B. (2013). When the abuse is unevenly distributed: The effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol 34, pp 1105–1123.
Padmanabhan, S. (2021). The impact of locus of control on workplace stress and job satisfaction: A pilot study on private-sector employees. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100026.
Pratama, A. A. N., & Cahyono, E. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis dengan Pendekatan Kuantitatif. LaksBang PRESSindo.
Qurrahtulain, K., Bashir, T., Hussain, I., Ahmed, S., & Nisar, A. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance with the mediation of vigor at work and moderation of internal locus of control. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2380.
Rodrıguez., A.E. Baillien., H.D. Witte., B.M. Jimenez., & J.C. Pastor. (2009). Cross-lagged relationships between workplace bullying, job satisfaction and engagement: Two longitudinal studies. Work & Stress. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp 225- 243.
Rodwell, J., Brunetto, Y., Demir, D., Shacklock, K., & FarrWharton, R. (2014). Abusive supervision and links to nurse intentions to quit. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46(5), 357-365.
Spector, Paul E. (1988). Development of the work Locus of Control Scale, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61 : 335-340.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal. Vol 43, pp 178- 190.
Tepper, B.J., J.C. Carr., D.M. Breaux., S. Geider., C. Hu., & W. Hua. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol 109, pp 156- 167.
Xu, E., X. Huang., C.K. Lam., & Q. Miao. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol 33, pp 531–543.
Yuwono, H., Eliyana, A., Buchdadi, A. D., Sariwulan, T., & Handicapilano, R. J. (2020). The Effect of Locus of Control on Employees' Job Satisfaction. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(8).