Swearing Produced by The Shelby Family in The Series Peaky Blinders

Main Article Content

Aptanta Faiz
I Made Suastra
Made Detriasmita Saientisna

Abstract

Swearing is the primary notion in this study. There are two objectives of this study, which are to classify the types of swearing in the series and categorize their motive. Swearing, in all its forms, has historically been both revered and reviled. It can serve as a cathartic release of emotion, a vehicle for rebellion against societal norms, or a sharp tool for emphasis. The analysis was conducted based on the theories proposed by Pinker (2007) and Stapleton (2003). Battistela (2005) differentiated swearing into 5 categories; Dysphemistic, Abusive, Idiomatic, Emphatic, Cathartic. Stapleton (2003) formulated the motives of swearing into nine types: story-telling, emphasis, anger/tension release, habit, normality, intimacy, vulnerability, part of personality, a way to shock. The analyzed data taken from a TV series Peaky Blinders. The collected data is analyzed by using the descriptive qualitative method since it did not involve any numerical data. Through the analysis, the use of swearing in a speech is revealed that the background of the character contributes to the family characteristics, in which it can affect their verbal aptitude and attitude, whether they will be good or bad. The Shelby family mostly swear because of the need to release or express their anger caused by the problems that they are facing on a daily basis and it is almost impossible for them to not express their emotions and anger in a form of swearing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Faiz, A. ., Suastra, I. M., & Saientisna, M. D. (2024). Swearing Produced by The Shelby Family in The Series Peaky Blinders. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 3(6), 6541–6547. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v3i6.5174
Section
Articles

References

Aditia, H. 2011 An Analysis of Taboo Word and swear Word in Dustin Lee Abraham’s How High Movie. thesis. Fakultas Adab Dan Humaniora Uin Syarif Hidayatullah.

Adams, M. 2016. In Praise of Profanity: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. London: Routledge

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bram, B., & Putra, P. K. 2019. Swear words used by Jordan Belfort in the Wolf of Wall Street movie. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 16(2), 135-145.

Hughes, G.I. 1991 Swearing a social history of foul language, oaths and prohanity in English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Jay, T., & Kristin J. 2008. The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness, 4, 267-288.

Jay, T. 2000. Why We Curse: A Neuro-Psycho-Social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Jay, T. 1992. Cursing in America.

Jay, T. 2009. The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153–161.

Labov, W., 2006. The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Ljung, M., 2011. Swearing: A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study.

McGuire, S. M. 1973 Obscenity: Its use and abuse. The Communicator

Kakisina, P.A., & Purwaningtyas, I. 2020. An Analysis of Swear Words in “Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood” Film. Okara: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 14, 224-238.

Prawinanto, A., Prasetyo, H., & Bram, B. 2020. Swearing nd Its Motives in The Antologi Rasa Novel.

Pinker, S. 2007. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. London: Penguin Books.

Stapleton, K 2003. 'Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice', Women and Language, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 22-33.

Stapleton, K. 2006. ‘12. swearing’, Interpersonal Pragmatics, pp. 289–306. doi:10.1515/9783110214338.2.289.

Trudgill, P. 2000. Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th ed.). London: Penguin Group.

Zeldes, A. 2010. Tony McEnery, Richard Xiao & Yukio Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London, New York: Routledge. xx, 386 S. Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft, Vol. 2 (Issue 2), pp. 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrs.2010.050